That
was weird. Curling Canada decided to change the format for the Olympic
Pre-Trials (AKA, Road to the Roar). In 2009 and 2013, a triple
knockout format determined the qualifying teams. 2009 included eight qualifiers (and plenty of TV coverage), and in its last iteration, the triple knockout led to a
page style playoff with 8 teams vying for 4 spots.
Everything seemed to work nicely.
This past week, fourteen teams of each gender (28 total) were placed into four pools of seven teams for round robin play. Each team played 6 games within its pool and the top 3 in each pool (12 total) qualified for a playoff. Including tie-breakers, the actual "playoff" became 10 of 14 womens teams and 9 of 14 mens teams. That means after 72 round robin games had been played, only 9 of 28 (32%) of teams had been eliminated! This makes the generous playoff formats of the NBA and NHL look quite stingy in comparison. I could understand the interest to have all of these round robin games for a television audience, but no games were broadcast until the weekend.
In
the end, Team Howard went 8-2 and fell short while Team Bottcher at 5-4
is heading to Ottawa in December. This isn't anything new. A round
robin format with play-offs can always lead to a team with several
losses taking victory from an undefeated team. For example, in the
famous 1985 Brier, Pat Ryan was undefeated, but lost the final to Al Hackner (7-4)
and could have instead lost to one of several playoff teams with a 6-5
record.
For
those opposed to this strange method of competition, you might
want to learn to embrace the insanity. With the Scotties and Brier
moving to smaller pools, the chances of multiple tie-breakers, extended
play-offs, and upset victories will only increase.
I'm not opposed to varying the process that events use to determine victory, but I did like the triple knockout formula for this event and I'm not sure what benefit this new format was supposed to create. With a longer round robin, there's a better chance to weed out teams and reduce tie-breakers, but then again, that 1985 Brier had half the competing teams extending their play into tie-breakers, so nothing is certain. I was looking forward to seeing how (if Fleury had beaten Tippin in the final round robin draw) they would arrange a 7-way tie breaker for the Womens Pool A. Always interesting when those late night games have more people on the ice than in the stands...
I'm not opposed to varying the process that events use to determine victory, but I did like the triple knockout formula for this event and I'm not sure what benefit this new format was supposed to create. With a longer round robin, there's a better chance to weed out teams and reduce tie-breakers, but then again, that 1985 Brier had half the competing teams extending their play into tie-breakers, so nothing is certain. I was looking forward to seeing how (if Fleury had beaten Tippin in the final round robin draw) they would arrange a 7-way tie breaker for the Womens Pool A. Always interesting when those late night games have more people on the ice than in the stands...
Couple of other observations...
Jim Cotter's rock clearing runback in the 9th end of that early morning may have been the shot of the game. Bottcher looked in good shape to force but the triple by Jim sent them into the 10th end tied with hammer.
Morris is Red
Not sure I agree with Howard's call in the 9th end. Ahead 5-4 without hammer,. and it's third Adam Spencer's last shot of the end.
Howard is Red
Look for more Curling Legends Podcasts this season and my upcoming preview to the Olympic Trials, with betting tips and odds for each team.
Until next time...
No comments:
Post a Comment